Aunt Julia and the Scriptwriter

I recently finished Mario Vargas Llosa’s novel Aunt Julia and the Scriptwriter, which turned out to be a fun read — it’s a light, comic novel, but it also plays around with ideas about writing and the writer and stories, which gives the book some depth. Apparently, the book is somewhat autobiographical, based on the relationship leading up to Vargas Llosa’s first marriage, and the real-life Julia wrote her own side of the story in a book called What Little Vargas Didn’t Say. I don’t know anything about Julia’s book, but judging by the title, Vargas probably didn’t like it.

The novel tells the story of Mario, an 18-year-old university student in Lima who works at a local radio station preparing news bulletins. Part of the story is about how he falls in love with “Aunt” Julia — she’s related to Mario only by marriage — but their relationship is still scandalous because she’s 32 and divorced. The other part is about Pedro Camacho, a scriptwriter recently come to write serials for the radio station. He soon becomes hugely popular as radio listeners find themselves enthralled by his stories, but then the stories start to take some very odd turns and nobody knows what to do with Camacho anymore. Camacho is a very odd character, with strange ticks and mannerisms, a unusual physical appearance (he’s almost short enough to be considered a dwarf), a self-centered and imperious manner, and some disturbing prejudices against Argentinians and against women generally.

These two plot lines unfold slowly over the novel’s course; every other chapter, however, gives the story of one of the serials Camacho is writing, appearing in the novel as regular prose, not in script form. These stories are soap operas, dramatic, shocking, and fun. But as Camacho’s serials start to turn strange, so too do these interpolated chapters. Characters get interchanged with one another, plot lines get mixed up, characters from one story begin to appear in another, and eventually the authorial voice has lost control of the stories entirely. By the end of the book we don’t have straightforward stories anymore, but attempts at plot filled with questions about the plot direction and the characters’ fates.

Camacho has become overwhelmed by his own productivity; he had been producing scripts at such a wild rate, that he begins to forget his plot lines and characters, collapsing under the strain of his long hours. It has turned into a battle between the author, trying to give form and shape to life, and chaos, undermining the very possibility of coherence and order.

Meanwhile, Mario himself dreams of becoming a writer. He watches Camacho with interest, trying to figure out the secret of Camacho’s amazing productivity:

Riding back to Miraflores in a jitney, I thought about Pedro Camacho’s life. What social milieu, what concatenation of circumstances, persons, relations, problems, events, happenstances had produced this literary vocation (literary? if not that what should it be called then?) that had somehow come to fruition, found expression in an oeuvre and secured an audience? How could he be, at one and the same time, a parody of the writer and the only person in Peru who, by virtue of the time devoted to his craft and the works he produced, was worthy of that name?

Mario thinks about what it means to be a writer, and whether he’s capable of becoming one himself.  Camacho is very nearly the perfect definition of a hack writer, churning out the melodramatic stories day after day, but, at this point in the story at least, Mario can’t help but admire his energy and his ease with words and stories:

It was becoming clearer and clearer to me each day that the only thing I wanted to be in life was a writer, and I was also becoming more and more convinced each day that the only way to be one was to devote oneself heart and soul to literature. I didn’t want in the least to be a hack writer or a part-time one, but a real one like — who? The only person I met who came closest to being this full-time writer, obsessed and impassioned by his vocation, was the Bolivian author of radio serials: that was why he fascinated me so.

So this is a love story, but also a story about stories and about writing as a vocation. It’s a novel of the writer-in-training, about a character who lives through the excitement of teenage love and rebellion but who also gets a chance to watch a writer at work and to think about what kind of writer he wants to be.

9 Comments

Filed under Books, Fiction

9 responses to “Aunt Julia and the Scriptwriter

  1. I’ve never read Mario Vargas Llosa before. This book sounds really good. I think I will add it to my TBR list!

  2. This does sound good. I like the idea of merging the love story and writing story, two different kinds of romance.

  3. You make me want to re-read it (but that would be the third time, and I’ve just got way too much other stuff to read). Funny, when I read it the first time at age 20, I thought Aunt Julia was SO old and understood why the relatives were shocked. Now, of course, I’m like, “THAT was a scandel?”

  4. I think you’d enjoy it Stefanie! Jenclair, yes, that merging is one of the book’s best aspects. Emily, that’s right — what’s so old about 32???

  5. I suppose the gulf between 18 and 32 does sound rather large when you are young. Now both ages sound young! LOL. I had been aware of this novel before, but never thought to read it–it sounds like fun. I like it when an author can weave together more than one storyline well!

  6. I read this in school, and it was one of the easiest books (compared with Cortazar and others) in the Spanish-lit curriculum. That said, I still consider “Hundred Years of Solitude” and Borges my faves.

    (I had a Spanish minor, which is why I read all these–in the English, by the way.)

  7. Fendergal, I enjoyed One Hundred Years of Solitude too, but have yet to Borges, although I’ve been meaning to. I think I will enjoy him.

  8. Dorothy, a very good review. You’ve given me renewed hope about Spanish… like Brazilian, Latin-American literature.
    I’ve never been good at it.
    Even 100 Years of Solitude [with its 45 people with the same name and all] sort of eluded me. The fault is mine, perhaps.
    Similarly, I have several books by Jorge Amado sitting here…. I WANT to read them, but I am scared.
    The only Mario Vargas Llosa I have read, is the gargantuan War of The End of The World. It was great, in many ways. An epic.
    But they seem so difficult to me, these Spanish writers.
    This Julia book, as described by you, seems more accessible to the likes of me.

  9. Thanks Cipriano — if you ever do pick up the book, I think you’ll like it.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s