One last Johnson post

Well, I’ve finished Boswell’s Life of Johnson, and I feel a real sense of accomplishment looking at the very thick, 1250-page edition I’ve got on my shelves. I’m very glad I read it and that I read the whole thing, but I must say that Sandra‘s suggestion that I might read the abridged version was a good one, and although I didn’t follow her advice, I would recommend an abridgement to someone interested in the book but not … you know … obsessive about the time period or the author or subject.

I’m not usually one for abridgements; in fact, I’m really never one for them, but in this case, I think it’s justifiable if you’re sort of interested in the book but are hesitant to devote 1250 pages worth of time to it. The Life of Johnson is filled with interesting stories about Johnson and his friends; great anecdotes; meditations on reading, writing, religion, politics, and famous people of the time; and all kinds of other things. But it’s also full of lots of dull sections, too. It has long descriptions of legal cases Boswell was working on and sought advice from Johnson about. It has a lot of letters, many of which aren’t all that interesting — letters inquiring about people’s health or settling business details or making travel arrangements. Boswell throws everything into the book that someone completely and utterly obsessed with Johnson’s life would want to see — and I mean completely and utterly obsessed. The level of documentation is rather overwhelming.

It’s not at all like the biographies we read today that try to cover the subject’s life evenly and thoroughly; the section on Johnson’s life before Boswell appeared on the scene is relatively short and the later parts of Johnson’s life after Boswell are long. Rather than trying to create the kind of modern biographical narrative with developed stories and smooth transitions and an overarching argument, The Life is rather choppy, made up of short episodes that move abruptly from one to the next. It’s more like a pastiche of documentation and evidence and anecdote than a narrative. Boswell is half biographer, half editor.

Boswell is also an important part of the biography himself; while telling his first-hand accounts of time spent with Johnson, Boswell reveals much about himself — not only his actions and his half of the conversations and his letters to Johnson, but his capacity for friendship and adoration.

If there is an overarching argument to the book, it’s that while Johnson was not a perfect human being, he was awfully darn close; those who had ever attacked and criticized Johnson come in for their own dose of criticism here. Boswell does try to be fair, pointing out what he sees as Johnson’s faults, but the overriding tone is defensive: yes, Johnson looked odd, he could come across as rude, he would argue for things he didn’t believe in just for the fun of it, he could take pleasure in attacking people, and he held some rather bizarre beliefs, but he was a genius, and that’s what we should remember.

I’m hoping Adam Sisman’s Boswell’s Presumptuous Task comes in the mail soon, via Book Mooch, because I’m excited to learn about the creation of The Life. That, in itself, is bound to be a marvelous story.

6 Comments

Filed under Books, Nonfiction

6 responses to “One last Johnson post

  1. It is great accomplishment to complete a reading of this length, especially one that wasn’t always interesting. I too tend to avoid abridgements- I am always afraid that I will miss something. I doubt this is one that I will ever read, so I appreciate that you have shared your experience with us.

  2. Ed

    Have you read the letters of Fanny Burney. She too was a friend of Johnson, and has
    plenty of interesting things to say about him. In the copy that I have, one of her
    letters says that she deliberately avoided Boswell in order to avoid being mentioned
    in his books.

  3. Congrats on finishing the book, though I’m going to miss your (mostly) weekly Johnson posts!

  4. This is definitely a huge accomplishment! I’m intrigued now about Johnson, but I think I would opt for the abridged version if I was going to read it. Is there much in this area that you haven’t yet read? Have you read much American lit in this period? I take it Don Quixote will be the next long read now?

  5. LK

    Congrats, what an accomplishment. I like your new blog look, too.

  6. Thanks Brad, and I’m glad you liked the posts.

    Ed, I read a selection of Burney’s letters and journals recently and enjoyed them very much. I’d forgotten about her wish to avoid Boswell, though — that seems about right, doesn’t it!

    Stefanie — thanks, and I’m glad you liked the posts too!

    Danielle, I’ve read much of the stuff that’s in print these days, at least the novels. I’m not as well read in the poetry of the time, or the drama. And I’ve focused on British lit, not American, although there’s some American I know. And yeah, Don Quixote is next!

    LK — thanks!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s